Sunday, February 27, 2011

Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea

On page 43 out of 127

Note: Our versions of the book differ (Mine isn’t illustrated, Abby’s is), so the page numbers/number of pages will differ. It’s a real bummer, since I really like picture books. It’s also a bummer because my version of the book is ridiculously overpriced. Eh. Onto the review, post, commentary, analysis, whatchamacallit.

After analyzing several poems with complicated language and trying to figure out the not-so-straightforward ideas in them, the simplistic plot of Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea has been extremely refreshing. However, it took some getting used to. I found myself rereading sentences because they took actions and compressed them into such simple phrases I needed more time to visualize what had just happened. It starts off with an interesting plot, but it isn’t interesting enough. There’s a boy who’s always addressed as by “the boy”, and there’s an old man who’s always addressed as “the old man”. The first twenty pages are spent describing the relationship between the two and the poverty the old man faces and the old man’s unlucky fishing past, along with a very controlled conversation about baseball where the voices between the old man and the boy blend together because the dialogue isn’t characterized enough. The baseball conversation references to some players that I’ve never heard of and I doubt most of the people who read this book will understand because most readers of Hemingway aren’t exactly baseball fanatics, and even if they are the baseball conversation isn’t really relevant to anything. It also contains a bunch of dialogue that each of them seem to know is imaginary but that both of them seem unsure of, so the reader can’t be sure of it, and I haven’t found any part of it very helpful to the plot in any way. The second twenty pages are filled with descriptions of the old man going fishing and how he keeps following a bird to get the fish the bird seems to find. Then, he almost catches a dolphin. But he doesn’t. And he assumes that there’s a stray one around. It’s a little too optimistic for his bad luck streak he appears to have, and I can’t tell if it’s still part of his “imaginary” dialogue seeping into his personal thoughts.

My favorite part? When he sees a Portuguese man-of-war and uses the most description used in the entire 43 pages so far. And then…“‘Agua mala’, the man said. ‘You whore’”(Hemingway 35).

That’s right. He calls a jellyfish a whore. If there’s anything in the world I would’ve least expected, it was the combination of those two words. And there’s good reason to it, too. Hemingway goes on to explain by saying that the Portuguese man-of-war looks pretty, but stings hard, and then has the old man talk about how much he likes turtles because they eat the Portuguese man-of-war. In this, I find some probably unintended amusement, where first, we have jellyfish whores, and then, we have, by the symmetric property, whore-eating turtles.

However, the book quickly shuffles backward into its original state, except the old man finally catches something: An albacore tuna that he decides to use as bait, despite his poor living conditions, apparent bad luck streak, and the fact that the boy has already given him bait and appears to have the intent to continue doing so. However, the old man’s delight is very short-lived and confusing to me, since for some reason he has gone forty day’s without a fish, but right after catching a fish, tries to trace back to when he first started talking to himself. Then, he says something to himself about baseball, only to quickly tell himself not to think about baseball. Which makes me wonder: “What is the importance of baseball in a story about fishing? Did the random though of baseball even have to be mentioned?”

Unfortunately, our page division ends right in the middle of one of the seemingly important parts of the story where he is, so far, almost catching another big sea creature. Maybe, it’ll be one of his beloved sea-turtles. I’d be interested to see the inner conflict in him under that occurrence.

Elmore Leonard's "Rum Punch"

My Progress: I am currently on page 111
So to start off this blog discussion of "Rum Punch" I would like to first give a quick summary of the plot. "Rum Punch" is a story about gun smuggling taking place in Elmore Leonard's very own Florida. This book is said by the critics to contain much double crossing leading to a fast pace, thrill ride of a book. And obviously I could not just take the critics word for it, so I chose to bury my head in its pages instead.
The first thing I noticed when reading this book was Leonard's choice of language or lingo. He is writing a story about smugglers and gangsters so it is ideal that almost all of his quotes are written in a slang sort of dialect, but the most surprising part to me was that not only were the dialogue and thoughts of Leonard's characters written in slang, but so was everything else. Even when describing the setting Leonard seems to use slang terms and not create completely fluent or proper sentences. Although my writing may appear to be criticizing Leonard I actually think quite the opposite. Way to go Elmore Leonard, for stepping out of the confines of usual writing, and changing your style to enhance your book! I think that all this slang does is take the reader to that same place in Florida that Leonard is writing about, and make the reader become part of the story. It establishes a setting explaining that many of these characters may not have received very much education, placing them in the gangster lifestyle that they now live in, and this is how they talk.
The other thing I enjoy about this book is the fast pace exciting events. SPOILER ALERT! Although this is a spoiler feel free to read on because what I am about to tell you will not at all ruin the story. One of the most exciting things to happen so far was in the first 30 pages of this novel, one of the main characters already has double crossed another character, and lets just say that character #2 isn't feeling to good right now, as he lays in the trunk of a car with a some bullet holes strewn across his body. I wouldn't say that character #2 got the largest role in this story. Some of you might now be thinking that this is a horrible book, and it is horrible of me to promote gory killings. This, (the killing) however, is not what I am applauding Leonard for. I am thanking him for starting off his book with a "BANG" (both metaphorically and literally). I am one of those readers who enjoy exciting, page-turning books. In my opinion a book that is a fast read and provides suspense and excitement from page one, is a far better read than some "Classical" (to which I blow my nose at) book that leaves me with a poignant (and commonly melancholy) message at the end.

But what do you think? Do you enjoy classical reads that teach you something, or are you like me and enjoy fast-paced books and really do not honestly care about the soppy message at the end? Feel Free to let your voices be heard.... Or in other words COMMENT!!!

P.S. (Obviously that was a very biased question at the end and for that I apologize)
P.P.S. (Actually, do I apologize? Probably not, because everyone is entitled for his or her own opinion)
Anyways, thanks for reading. And come back next time to read my second impression on Elmore Leonard's "Rum Punch"
See You Soon!

Gary Gates

Go Ask Alice

The first 70 pages:
When I first picked up the book Go Ask Alice I expected it to be dark and horrific, personal and interesting. Most of my expectations have been met, though the novel proves to be less satisfying than I wanted it to be. Within the first 70 pages we journey into the narrator's life as she goes from a innocent and naive young girl to a distraught, somewhat lifeless young woman. Her stories are interesting and personal, though I do not favor the way the book is written. I feel as though a lot of important information is lost between the diary entries. For example, it seems as though in an instant, she was hooked on drugs. As a reader, I fell as though the "man vs. self" struggle to remain clean was not present. The novel may seem more personal written as diary entries, but I believe it could still posses personal touch in addition to being more interesting if it were written like a normal novel with "connecting sentences" in between dialogue to further elaborate on her situation. Furthermore, I noticed that since the narrator began using drugs, her voice and vocabulary have changed as well. In the opening pages, she seemed happy and cheerful, using words like, "beautiful and exciting" to describe her life. As the book goes on and her addiction becomes worse, the narrator turns to curse words to describe her new and secret life. As seen in the first 70 pages, drugs, on and off of them make life lonely and miserable for those who dare to try them once more.