Monday, November 29, 2010
The Secret Life of Bees
Though sad to say, this is all I have read in the book due to the long, stressful process of moving into our family’s new house.
When analyzing this novel I keep looking back at one comment Lily remembers her mom saying the day she dies. “The closet floor vibrated whenever someone climbed the stairs below it, which is how I knew T. Ray was coming. Over my head I heard my mother, pulling things from the hangers, the swish of clothes, wire cling together. Hurry, she said” (6.) Why was Lilly’s mother leaving and why did she want to get away before T. Ray came? All of this is a mystery to me, but I made some assumptions. Maybe T. Ray was abusive to Lilly’s mother; maybe she was trying to leave with Lily to a safer place away from T. Ray. There was also one more subject Lilly described that I couldn’t help but wonder about. When T. Ray is woken up by Lilly wanting him to see the swarm of bees, T. Ray says, “’You wake me up again, Lily, and I’ll get out the Martha Whites, you hear me?’ Martha Whites were a form of punishment only T. Ray could have dreamed up. I shut my mouth instantly” (5.) I know harsh punishments and beatings were considered normal back in older times, but when saying only T. Ray could have thought up something as the Martha Whites, I can’t help wondering if T. Ray was too cruel on his child, and if that tied into Lily’s mom trying to leave him. I also can’t help wondering what the Martha Whites punishments were!
Reading this book, I’m glad my group members and I chose it. The Secret Life of Bees is a suspenseful, unique novel that I can’t wait to read more about. Though just starting it, I highly recommend for you to pick up a copy of this novel and read it!
Sunday, November 28, 2010
The Bermudez Triangle
Novel by Maureen Johnson
[Pages: 81/370]
Let's be honest: I am reading a chick flick. I will try to dignify that label by stressing the complexity of the situations within the novel-and the controversial and current topic that drives the... drama.
I would also like to say-upfront and honestly- that this novel is a controversy. It has been banned in some areas as it deals with sexuality- specifically the ever potent homosexuality. This novel is risky, but something I am willing to gamble with.
At first, I found the friendship trio that is the skeleton of the novel to be cliche. Nina, Avery, and Mel have been best friends since they had the emotional and physical capacity to make friends blah blah blah. A first glance left me thinking of the trio as overused, unoriginal and frankly boring; but when an affair between two of the three girls begins to unfold behind the other girl's back this story becomes utterly delicious. This plot has me caught in its web, I am thirsty for more.
Though the characters can be stereotypical (one is a driven, bossy, 'leader'; another is a free-spirit who refuses to let anyone or anything control her; the last being a classically and spellbindingly beautiful red head who instills blistering crushes unto any boy she meets) the author is able to create depth through the actions of the characters. The author has allowed the characters to develop their own depth rather than establish them as being profound. (A porfound chick flick, imagine that!) This is highly appreciated. A story is much more interesting with dynamic characters than with static ones, obviously. Johnson also gives the third girl a love interest, this seems both fair and logical. Not only does this third party add spice to the novel, it creates an better balance to the overall dynamic between the girls. The fact that the love interest is a tree hugging, bicycle riding, Birkenstock adorning stud from Oregon doesn't hurt either. To add even more spice the author created this relationship only to doom it to a 'long-distance-trying-to-make-it-work' sort.
My only complaint towards the novel would be the utter disregard for reality when dealing with homosexuality with her characters. By page 50 or so- and only one homosexual encounter- Johnson has already had one of her characters stamp a large, bold, red LESBIAN across her forehead. Really? Can someone truly define their sexuality after only one actual sexual/romantic encounter? This to me seems dreadfully unrealistic and disappointing. I feel that the author disregards that difficult realization as nothing more than a 'I-think-I'll-dye-my-hair-blue' decision.
I look forward to reading further and witnessing the drama unfurl between the girls.
"The Testament"- By John Grisham
The Glass Castle
The Hunger Games
In the first book of this thrilling trilogy, find out how Katniss overcomes adversity and manages to stay alive against kids who have trained there entire life to win the games. Many real life tensions are implemented into this book, such as the rich vs. the poor, and love vs. humanity. It's nonstop action that you cannot miss, and things heat up in the end as the amount of tributes dwindle. Remember, only one person can win the games- will it be the baker, Peeta, or the small but saavy huntress, Katniss? Read The Hunger Games and discover the truth.
The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook
The first tidbit of bad human behavior occurs immediately in the first chapter. Right away Eduardo, a main character, is lying about his abilities to make himself more likely to get into a fraternity. The lying is one thing but changing who he is just to find acceptance among his peers seems like a negative example of human nature. Eduardo understands Social Darwinism and knows that only the strong can survive, so he makes himself strong even though it costs him his values. While this does not seem like a big deal, this little act sets the scene for later behavior in the story.
The further along the story gets, the crazier the behavior becomes. Soon after Eduardo's impressive lying, Mark Zuckerburg hacks into the computers of every fraternity and sorority in Harvard. This displays that human greed trumps all and that Mark was willing to let his own desires become more important than the privacy of others, the school rules, and even the law.
Later on Mark lies to the entrepreneurs that hire him and he tells them that he is incapable of making their website. A few days later he launches his own website that is almost identical to theirs. Mark is not above lying and stealing to get ahead in life, a tendency that shows the evil that humans have managed to achieve. Later on the entrepreneurs that had originally hired Mark decide to take legal action against him; they try to fight for justice. When they take their case to the president of Harvard they are completely ignored, showing that humans are willing to ignore injustice because it is easier than fighting injustice head on.
Once Thefacebook gains success Sean Parker wants to be part of it so he can get rich. Like parasites that attach themselves to stronger beings to survive, humans try to link themselves to success even if they had nothing to do with the success.
It may sound pessimistic to call humans greedy, evil, jealous creatures, but The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook has definitely not given any evidence to contrary views. Ben Mezrich has painted his cast of characters to be some of the most evil beings on the planet. The story may be dramatic, but maybe there seems to be some truth in Ben Mezrich's take on human nature.
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Armor- John Steakley
After reading a decent portion of the book, this book can only be classified as a "military science fiction" novel. I am usually not a fan of of fantasy novels, but so far I have been pleasantly surprised by the way the book doesn't have much of an introduction and just cuts to the chase so the reader can experience some "military science fiction" action. The story begins by introducing Felix, the main character. He is a young man who is a military trainee for a interplanetary army. The novel begins while he awaits his first "Drop" or deployment onto a planet to fight aliens. After only nine months of training to fight, he is finally ready to try on the suit in which the soldiers use to give themselves superhuman characteristics. The suit makes them virtually indestructible. It is made of a material called "plasteel", which is probably a combination of plastic and steel. It makes the soldiers very strong: they can pierce through a skeleton and metal with a single punch or kick. The suit can also make them run at a hundred kilometers per hour.
Felix is deployed in a strange planet with poisonous air and water. He and the rest of his blockade must fight thousands of nine-foot tall ants with rock hard exo-skeletons. Out of hundreds of scouts, he is one of only a couple of people to survive. He meets a woman named Forest who helps him find civilization again, and he meets up with three very experienced soldiers, Obel, Yin and Bolov. Then they will start a new tactic for their battle against the ants.
They will climb atop a mesa which can only be climbed by a narrow trail to prevent their army from being further destroyed.
So far the novel is quite interesting and is a good challenge for the reader. I look forward to finishing it up in the coming weeks.
The Hunger Games
The Green Mile by Stephen King
or rather
Tiny Little Annoyances
...interesting.
And don't get me wrong, I do find it interesting. In some places, it's interesting in ways that it shouldn't be. Within five pages of chapter two, the narrator has mentioned his urinary infection three times. At the same time, he is remembering when John Coffey, who can be assumed to be the main character, first enters the state penitentiary. Each time he says something about his urinary infection, it's always equal to him saying something like, "My urinary infection was aggravating". It doesn't appear to serve a purpose, and reminds me of the book How Not to Write a Novel by Howard Mittelmarx and Sandra Newman; The authors use an example that they title "The Gum on the Mantelpiece", in which they mislead the reader into thinking that a piece of already chewed gum will serve some purpose in the story, only to have all the characters leave the room and have one character simply clean the gum off the mantelpiece later. It completely distracts the reader from the storyline. Quite simply, the urinary tract infection and piece of gum don't need to be involved in the story, and pull away from it. People want to hear about urinary tract infections and insignificant pieces of gum as much as they want to hear a full plot summary of some TV show they don't plan on watching from the show's biggest, most obsessive fan, or most resentful, cocky critic.
King's redundancy in The Green Mile also appears when he is describing John Coffey's size. While it is important to know how large a character is, it makes one weary when they are told the exact size,"six feet, eight inches" (King 10, 13), of John Coffey twice within four pages. In between, King uses words such as "huge" (King 11), and "big" (King 12). Yes, the reader is aware that someone who is six feet and eight inches tall is pretty big and huge. Using one paragraph, or even one sentence to express his size would suffice for at least one chapter. In regards to description, so far the book has been only that. Granted, it is important to know the setting of the story. But King's use of setting drags it's feet along for an entire chapter, especially since his first couple sentences, "This happened in 1932, when the state penitentiary was still at Cold Mountain. And the electric chair was there, too, of course" (King 3), doesn't bring the reader to want to find out much, other than to find out what "this" is. At the end of the chapter, the only thing really pulled out from it is that sometimes murderers die at Cold Mountain by electric chair. It appears that the barely introduced conflict has disappeared in the fog of the setting and won't be back for a long time.
Frankly, a last annoyance from the story is that so far, the reader has not been told the narrators name. While King takes the time to introduce minor characters who are unlikely to resurface and quickly force five new major characters on the reader, four of them all within one sentence, he neglects to tell the reader the narrators name. It would have been easy to let one of the characters address the narrator by his name in dialogue, after all, it happens often in real life. But no, Stephen King won't let the reader know his name. He even takes one of the characters, Harry Terwilliger, and has him address the narrator as "boss"(King 12), where it would be the perfect opportunity to tell the reader just who, exactly, is speaking.
Despite all these little things that buzz around my face, I can swat them away because even though The Green Mile has it's flaws, King has given the narrator a riveting way of telling us what is going on and what has happened in the past at Cold Mountain. And I'd like to read what else he has to say. Even if I know too much about his urine, but not one of the simplest things about him, his name.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/24/2010
I guess this is sort of like a backup blog post; I’ve just had this thought in the back of my mind for a while (By the way, I’m still on the same page as before).
Every single time Stephen King describes the state penitentiary in The Green Mile, I never get anything out of it. I’m sure he has some image in his head like this:
I tried to make it accurate, but I couldn’t figure out how it looked even after reading it three times. Maybe I’m just a little dense. What I see when I read his description is this:
…What I’m trying to say is that if you’re reading this book for leisure, you may get a bit frustrated at Mr. King.
Friday, November 26, 2010
"A Time to Kill", by John Grisham
The first thing I hope you noticed about my post is the title of the book, “A Time to Kill”, by John Grisham. If you didn’t, I would hope it’s because you were too busy being amazed that I managed to blog my post (or is it post my blog?) a whole three days before the due date (for those of you who didn’t know that the due date is in three days, now is an appropriate time to be hysterical).
About the title: notice any similarities to any other books we’ve read this year? I thought it was suspiciously similar to “To Kill a Mockingbird”, by Harper Lee. I haven’t finished the book, so I cannot state what the symbolic meaning of my book is, but there are, actually, quite a few similarities between this book and Harper Lee’s masterpiece. To begin with, a defining element of the plot in “A Time to Kill” is the rape of a ten-year-old African American girl by two white men. In Lee’s book, it is the rape of a white woman by an African American man. Also, the setting in both books is a prejudiced southern town. The reason is, of course, to add emphasis to the rape crime.
However, there is no ‘hero’ character in “A Time to Kill”. Rather, the ‘Atticus’ part is played by criminal attorney Jake Brigance. He is not nearly as righteous as Atticus, and his reason for taking the case is for the publicity, not because he feels he must to have a clear conscience (the court case in the Grisham book is between the father of the rape victim and the state; the father murdered both rapists). Because of this, though, the character is easier to connect to. It is less difficult for me to relate to a less-perfect, more realistic character than the ideal, perfectly righteous Atticus. Simply put, the lawyer in “A Time to Kill”, while not in any way an antagonist, is much more like you’d imagine a lawyer to be.
“A Time to Kill” is told in third person (limited), so, even though Brigance is the main character, he is not always present during major events. This further helps the story develop, because, with the intricate, interwoven plots (activist groups for or against the defendant of the murder trial) the reader would not be able to follow the plot fully by only following Brigance. Interest is also added to the plot this way, because the reader knows about upcoming events before Brigance, allowing the reader to be nervously awaiting the occurrence of such events. These factors have led to my having to force myself to only read enough for one blog post at a time. So far, the plot is extremely believable and exciting.
Overall, through the first hundred and thirty-seven pages of “A Time to Kill”, by John Grisham, the book is shaping up to be an enjoyable pleasure read.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Thirteen Reasons Why
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Brave New World
Monday, November 1, 2010
"The Chamber" by Johnny Grisham
One page isn't very much, but this book gets right to it. Already, John Grisham has thrown in some racial prejudice as he talks about the Civil Rights Movement in Mississippi, yet in the page, the bulk of the prejudice isn't against African-Americans. Instead, I find it very interesting how the first character is Jewish lawyer, and this Jewish lawyer is in some major trouble. Specifically, Grisham is writing about a bomb plot and the three men involved in the bombing.
So, the first page is pretty abrupt; there is a lawyer, some violence, and already the slightest bit of suspense - just what I expected out of Grisham. While I wasn't surprised by his style of writing, I believe it is very good after one page and I look forward to the other 675 pages. On the topic of 675 pages, I believe an exciting, suspenseful style of writing is necessary when it comes to a book this long. If Grisham can take law, which is a potentially interesting topic, and make it an action packed and dramatic story, then I will be on the edge of my seat and each page will only get better and better. If not, then the excessive amount of paper will come in handy for a fire during this upcoming winter.
May this book be awesome even after the first page, and may Jewish lawyers have some peace.
Chris Beltrone (C-Bizzle)
How to Post Your Entries
Remember, when the first person is ready to post about a chosen book, click on NEW POST. Title the post with the title of your book. Write the first blog entry. That will be what everyone sees. After that first entry, every other entry about the same book will be posted under COMMENTS. In order to add a comment, whoever is posting must click on the actual post that is already there.
It is pretty easy folks. I look forward to reading your many insights.